Friday, May 18, 2012

Controversy over Dr.B.R.Ambedkar's Cartoon


I am a strong supporter of freedom of speech and expression. But the inclusion of a cartoon in CBSE political science book is done with a wrongful intention and it needs to be condemned. Despite non cooperation by the constituent committee members and lack of support from many prominent political leaders (Including the then President Rajendra prasad and PM Nehru himself had some objections over the inclusion of some crucial laws and stalled the constitutional work). So Such is the truth the inclusion of the controversial cartoon does not shed any truth at all. Instead of criticizing the persons responsible for deliberately delaying the constitutional process its highly unfair to show a cartoon that criticizes Dr.B.R. Ambedkar alone. With this I am posting an article that appeared in The Hindu paper.
                                   
An illustration in a textbook must expand or add to the lesson; Shankar's cartoon of Ambedkar does neither. The controversy kicked up over the withdrawal of a textbook for high school over a cartoon after a ruckus in Parliament has been superficially interpreted and uniformly criticised without understanding the sensitivities of the oppressed for whom B.R. Ambedkar is a hero. The anger of Dalits is being interpreted as intolerance while in fact it is an assertion of a people who are in the process of finding their long-suppressed voice and learning to stand up to insults and humiliation. What is needed is not criticism and anger but sensitivity to the emotions of a horribly wronged people. 

Those lamenting the move by the government in Parliament and the apology by Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal for using the cartoon have preferred to understand it as a cynical move to “appease” the supporters of B.R. Ambedkar for political reasons, namely not to antagonise a large section of voters when elections are round the corner. A social scientist was scornful calling it “psepho-cracy” and ruing that the spirit of democracy hadn't seeped into society. Yet another said the government's withdrawal of the offending textbook was a “nominal if not hypocritical” acknowledgement of Dalit power. One could agree with both commentators: there is no question that democracy has not seeped into society which has remained deeply and irreconcilably divided along caste lines; what prevails in our society and in very many minds that have not been influenced either by education or modernity is “caste-ocracy.” As for Dalit power, it has not yet gained mass but is strong enough to force the government of the day to draw back. Hence, it is immaterial whether the acknowledgement is nominal or hypocritical. The crucial thing is that it is real. 

While the government is supposed to have caved in to the protests in Parliament, it is a fact that the issue witnessed the unusual spectacle of the entire Opposition united in the belief that the cartoon had denigrated Ambedkar. The issue led to the resignation of two “chief advisers” of the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), both professors of political science, as they did not agree with Parliament's stand on the issue. 

What the critics say
 
The critics of the government's decision make the following points to show that the inflamed sentiments of Dalit supporters both in Parliament and outside are misplaced: that the cartoon is about 60 years old and that it was drawn by a well-known and highly popular cartoonist Shankar; that Nehru was democratic enough to appreciate and even enjoy the lampooning he occasionally got at Shankar's hands; that even Ambedkar would have chuckled at the cartoon especially since there is no evidence of him being offended by it when it was first published in 1948. Those who made the decision to include the cartoon also point out that an effort was made to make the lesson interesting, to infuse some humour in it. Using outdated cartoons as this one certainly is, is hardly fun. Perhaps Ambedkar laughed on seeing the cartoon. Or if he hadn't, he would have shaken it off as he had so many barbs in his lifetime, but that is beside the point. What is the relevance of this particular cartoon in the context of a lesson? Sure, it is important for a student to be told that the process was laborious and that it took several years for the Constitution to be finalised. A cartoon is a comment and a reflection on current situations and personalities of those times. Then, the cartoon was relevant and summarised pithily the delay in finalising the Constitution, but today, after 60 years, it is totally outdated and neither provides any insight nor reflects on the process of the making of the Constitution. 

Importantly, any illustration with a lesson or with any piece of writing, expands and adds to the “body” or the text. It even contextualises the text. The cartoon neither adds to nor contextualises the Constitution. Importantly, in the overall context of the making of the Constitution, seen from the perspective of the present, how is the delay in finalising it important? There are more important things that need to be foregrounded to understand the process of the making of the Constitution such as how the then President Rajendra Prasad, a confirmed conservative opposed equal property rights for women, and how a modernist Nehru caved in to him and how when an outraged Ambedkar threatened to quit the team they agreed to it. Poking fun at somebody else's icons is so much easier than one's own, just as it is easy to use somebody else's opinion to introduce one's own predilection. 

Panic situation
 
Apart from criticising the “intolerance” of Dalits and the “weak-kneed” response of the government, the critics are trying to create a panic situation, making alarmist statements that perhaps the government will now withdraw all the textbooks produced by the NCERT under the National Curriculum Framework or that now cartoonists will have to think twice before they put their pencils or paint brush to paper. At this rate all cartoons will have to be banned, says an apologist for the cartoon. 

One of the professors claims that the cartoon was included to expose students to the different ways in which leaders and events were understood and viewed. One has no issue with this. If one wants to include criticism, then do it openly and not go about it indirectly. The way it has been done in the book shows dishonesty. Surely, a rational and reasoned critique won't be objected to by any thinking person. Shankar lampooned Nehru, Parliament and important events in his cartoons. Why were those not included to expose students to different interpretations? The professor also claims that for the first time, Ambedkar was given his due in a textbook as not just as Father of the Constitution but as one who laid the democratic foundations of the country: you give with one hand and take it away with another! 

The issue is not that it is after all a cartoon; not about a sense of humour or the lack of it among some; nor is it about the unreasonableness or prickliness of some. It is about misrepresenting, it is about trivialising, it is about a lack of sensitivity. Most importantly, it is about a callousness that is rooted in one's own biases and prejudices. That is why the cartoon is hardly funny. 

(R. Akhileshwari is a journalist and academic.)



IMPORTANT NOTE:
India third 'snoopiest' country: Google Transparency Report. The GOI have requested Google to censor the internet contents/opinions of many users who speak against the Indian government. Even dictatorship countries haven't placed such a number of censor requests to the Google. So it’s clear that the government of India is keeping an eye on its internet users and with the help of Google, GOI have acquired the privacy details of the internet users to intimidate them. The important fact is that the Indian government seeks censorship to political views, hate speech, Government Criticism etc. It is clear we the Indians don’t have freedom of speech when it comes to criticizing government in key issues.

DISCLOSURE:

Hence I hereby declare that the above article is my personal opinion and it is not being copied from any other Internet/anti-India websites.
 

5 comments:

  1. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Article above,I humbly request every body interested in such issues let Dalits rise up at their own.Its only Dr B R Ambedkar who suffered with them and could realise the plight after Lord Buddha.Perhaps Lord Buddha could not suffer with them but surely he raised voice against the persecutors of them. To realise the suffering of Dalits one has to step into the shoes of Dalits which is not possible for Amir Ji or any body though to earn in the name of Dalits has been a fashion and in coming days its the only area where the socalled intellectuals will find green field to do and earn......
    At last i wish speedy recovery to my favourite fire brand journalist VTR

    Mohindri Satyarthy
    Dalit Voice

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. I appreciate whatever BR Ambedkar has done but i would like you guys to read the accounts of the viceroys in round table conference and how ambedkar got an oppurtunity as a law minister.These were known by people then but has faded into the history now.Sometimes we ought to think like indians too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Bania is the worst parasitic class known to history. In him, the vice of money-making is unredeemed by culture or conscience. He is like an undertaker who prospers when there is an epidemic.

    The only difference is that the undertaker does not create an epidemic while the Bania does ... With no conscience, there is no fraud and no chicanery that he will not commit. His grip over the nation is complete. The whole of poor, starving, illiterate India is mortgaged to the Bania." guess who said this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. and yeah bania is gandhi's caste. Even i think you guys will agree that gandhi was never a money minded person.

    ReplyDelete